[Multiple myeloma: response to treatment and survival of patients according to the interim analysis of the Russian observational, retrospective-prospective, multicenter cohort study (MULTISPECT)].

AIM: The primary objective of the interim analysis of the MULTISPECT study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of the treatment and long-term outcomes in cohorts of primary and pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving treatment in actual clinical practice in various regions of the Russian Federation. Secondary objectives were a description of the main characteristics of patients; analysis of the most commonly used therapy regimens of the 1st and later lines and the sequence of their changes; evaluation of the response to therapy. Additional objectives included evaluation of the effect of the new COVID-19 coronavirus infection on the course of MM in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is an observational retrospective-prospective multicenter cohort study. For its implementation, a structured database of patients with MM was used, provided by hematologists of the centers affiliated for the study. RESULTS: The study included 1,294 patients (cohort 1 806, cohort 2 488). In both cohorts, patients aged 6069 years were in the majority. 3 lines of therapy (L1, L2, L3) were used for cohort 1; in cohort 2, the 4th line of therapy was also used in 2 patients. The therapy regimens were analyzed for 290 (22.41%) of all patients in the study. Responses to therapy were analyzed for 214 patients of cohort 1 and 109 patients of cohort 2. Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations were carried out for a limited proportion of patients in both cohorts. At the end of the study and upon presentation of its results, the status of patients was the following: 96% of patients in cohort 1 and 89% in cohort 2 were alive. The therapy regimens in both cohorts were characterized by variability. The most commonly used regimens in each of the lines of therapy have been identified. The most used therapy regimen in patients with MM of both cohorts was the VCD-regime. Rd-regime in cohort 1 and RD-regime in cohort 2 were the second most frequent used regimens. In patients of both cohorts, the therapy regimens including Bortezomib were most often used. CONCLUSION: The variety of therapy regimens used to treat MM in actual clinical practice may be due to the factors of availability of new medicines and updated recommendations for the treatment of the disease. Further, in the context of this study, a more detailed analysis of the efficacy of certain therapy regimens in the 1st and later lines on progression free survival and overall survival of MM patients should be carried out.

EXPERIENCE WITH HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING, BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION AND TARGETED THERAPY FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA WITH A POOR PROGNOSIS

The study presents a clinical case of treating acute myeloid leukemia with an unfavorable genetic prognosis due to genotyping by high-throughput sequencing. The patient underwent related allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with targeted chemotherapy. The disease manifested itself after a new coronavirus infection. Mutations R140Q in the IDH2 gene and P799S in the DNMT3A gene were detected by high throughput sequencing. Given the unfavorable genetic prognosis, bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-compatible sibling was performed. On day 22, COVID-19 was detected, and ruxolitinib was added to the treatment. On the 25th day, hematopoiesis was restored with the preservation of clinical and hematological remission. Ten months after transplantation, a relapse was diagnosed, for which the patient started targeted therapy with 5-azacytidine with venetoclax in combination with transfusions of donor leukocytes. The second remission was achieved after the first course. The total duration of follow-up was 24 months. © Group of authors, 2022.

The 15 Year Long-Term Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia from 35 Regions of Russian Federation: A Follow up of a Multicenter Observation Study Eutos Osp Initiated By European Leukemia NET

The results of long-term follow-up of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) do not lose their importance. Data from routine clinical practice are of particular interest. The use of 1 st (imatinib, IM) and 2nd generation TKI (2G TKI) led to a significant increase in survival, so the probability of death associated with CML could be significantly lower than the probability of death due to common causes of death other than CML. To analyze the overall survival (OS) and causes of mortality in CML pts treated in routine clinical practice in Russian Federation for a long period (>15 years) of time. The long-term follow-up data of the Russian part of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) OSP EUTOS multicenter observational study were evaluated. The analyzed cohort consisted of 678 Ph/BCR-ABL-positive CML pts from 35 regions of Russia diagnosed in 2002-2006 with IM therapy initiation ≤6 months (mo) after diagnosis. Median (Me) age was 47(range 18-81) years (y), 47% males. Chronic phase, accelerated phase and blast crisis at diagnosis was in 631 (93%), 41(6%) and 6(1%) pts, respectively. The annual number of newly diagnosed pts was as follows: 2002 - 15 pts, 2003 - 38 pts, 2004 - 46 pts, 2005 - 206 pts, 2006 - 302 pts. The last update for 209 pts was done in Jun. 2021;last contact for 100 pts - in 2020, for 39pts - in 2019, for the other - before 2018. The date of the last contact/death could not be established for 14 pts. Statistical analysis included 661 pts, the OS was evaluated by Kaplan-Mayer method using the SAS 9.4 package. In total, 331 (50%) pts of the analyzed cohort were alive with the Me follow-up of 180 (range 2-232) mo or 15 y (range 2 mo-19,3 y). All pts started therapy with IM with 25% switched to 2G TKI in subsequent therapy lines. In total, 218 (66%) pts achieved MR4, 183 (55%) pts got MMR;46 (21%) of these pts with deep molecular response (DMR) were observed in hematology centers of Moscow. The 15-y OS in the total cohort was 63% (CI 59-70%)(fig.1). The OS by age groups was as follows: 18-40yy-75% (CI 73-82%), 40-60yy- 63% (CI 59-70%), 60-80yy- 37% (CI 30-45%). The most complete information was provided by Moscow centers (2 centers, 113 pts). The 15-y OS of pts receiving treatment in Moscow was significantly higher vs pts from other regions (32 centers, 548 pts): 75% vs 60%, p=0,0030 (fig.2). The mortality in the whole cohort of 661 pts was 35% (233 pts). Of these 233 pts, 112(48%) pts deaths were due to CML progression to AP or BP (including non-compliant cases);3pts (1,5%) died after allogenic stem cell transplantation (infection complications);the cause of death was unknown in 50 (21,5%) pts. The highest death rate from CML progression was at 4-9 y of follow-up. Deaths caused by concomitant diseases were in 68 (29%) pts: coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction/heart failure in 42 (62%) of 68 pts, acute ischemic stroke in 10 (15%) pts, second malignancies (Cr- cancer) in 10 (15%) pts (lung tumor, metastatic esophageal Cr, stomach Cr, brain tumor, sigmoid colon Cr, rectal colon Cr, melanoma, renal Cr, breast tumor, other hematological malignancies), accidents - 1 pt, liver cirrhosis - 2 pts, in 2 cases - respiratory virus infections complicated with pneumonia, 1 pt died due to Covid-19. Conclusions. The long-term follow-up of the multicenter study EUTOS OSP in 35 regions of Russian Federation allows not only to characterize the 15-y OS in CML pts but also provides the long-term outlook of the routine clinical practice. Probably, better OS of CML patients receiving treatment in Moscow (2 centers) may be related to organizational issues of interaction with the federal center, better monitoring and timely switching to 2G TKI therapy. The organization and support of multicenter studies may improve the situation with the treatment of diseases of the blood system. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Chelysheva: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Vinogradova: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Phar a: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Lomaia: Novartis: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;BMS: Honoraria;Pharmstandard: Honoraria. Voloshin: Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Consultancy;Biacad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Turkina: Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau;Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau.